View Full Version : duplicate mortgage entry now off....


dougpratt
... and my scores went down!

i've tried twice to post this thread to the "credit scoring causes defaults" section, and it doesn't show up.

the difference was only a few points, but i'm still 5 short of YES, defined by the magical quackware as 680.

publicity is the best policy, and these heartless bastards should have picket lines with protestors carrying signs in front of their offices-- if i had my way, it would continue througout the night at their homes, nonviolently, in a manner that wouldn't prompt local police to makes arrests for disorderly conduct or disturbing the peace. draw out the media, and bring this great, federally funded SCAM into the spotlight, so everyone can know exactly how they are being CHEATED and RIPPED OFF, and decide for themselves if Big Brother's defective quackware control over their lives is Fair, or not. the world should know about this FRAUD.

FICO scores fluctuate arbitrarily because everybody is evaluated by computer programs that place them on a bell curve; as profiles change in real time, individual scores may improve or deteriorate, based upon how other people sitting on the same curve conduct their finances. this is why FICO scoring CAN NEVER BE FAIR!!-:(:mad:

given that this defective automated system has been delegated complete CONTROL over the lending industry, all consumers must understand that their ability to borrow, drive, insure their homes, and provide basic utility services such as telephone and electricity now rests in the hands of one company, {UN}fair, isaac, based in san rafael, california. shielded under a veil of federal government sanctioned secrecy, no one is allowed to challenge or even know how they are being judged, or what to do to address an inferior categorization once it has occured.

slowly but surely, consumer rights are being eliminated. a pattern of corporate abuse is rapidly taking shape, and FICO has become the cornerstone of its design and implimentation. the next step i forsee is a wholescale takeover of the health care industry. you'll live or die, or watch your baby starve, based entirely upon a FICO score-- and if you do get care, somebody else will suffer the same fate for the very same reason.

as graduated penalty is applied to mortgage rates based upon a credit score, authors and proponents of this system can proclaim its benefits and accuracy-- borrowers forced to pay more interest on their loans because of their score will statistically default more often, and it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. the evaluation of true risk to the lender provided by FICO is nil-- its substitution for normal underwriting process provides a legally acceptable excuse to price-gouge all consumers, eliminating fair market competition among lenders who would otherwise offer their best products to get the business, earn trust, and build confidence to assure client loyalty, and form mutually beneficial relationships over extended periods of time. as FICO removes the human component, it also undermines and destroys the personal aspects of banking, as the underwriter is no longer given any choice, lattitude, or ability to negotiate rate and terms, or consider extenuating circumstances, either in favor or against the loan applicant. with 680 FICO score, a convicted felon or homeless drunk can get a mortgage with no money down, subject only to a satisfactory property appraisal. i have been denied 70% LTV loans on my primary residence with a flawless credit history going back 15 years, $130,000 income, and $300,000 or more in equity, also based solely upon FICO scoring. this puts me into a sub-prime category, with mortgages several points above prime fannie/freddie rates, and there is no provision
whatsoever for anyone along the way to intercede in absence of that required 680 middle FICO score. tonight i'm at 675, and that still means NO!

every member of congress should be informed of this outrage, as should every state attorney general throughout the country. slow moving class action lawsuits have been filed against fannie and freddie, those who first bought into the FICO madness, with the rest of the lending industry, and now insurance companies and utility providers following suit. lower FICO scores supposedly means greater risk [it actually means virtually nothing], so they can jack up your rates on everything. {UN}fair isaac has been splitting their stock as the rest of the economy languishes-- it doesn't take an MBA to figure this one out.

the roman empire came to an end, and built upon fraud and false pretenses, FICO is enjoying their hour, but will also follow in due course. this company has cost me more than $200,000 over the past few years, wiped out my retirement, and forced me to sell a very lucrative property to put a stop to the outrageous interest rates i was forced to pay on my mortgages simply because my scores made it impossible to refinance at the normal, competitive rates i was always offered before they took over this industry. it will be one glorious day when they file chapter 7-- if the principles this country was founded upon and stands for still hold true, that day is not very far in the future.

goodnight--
:cool:

Christine
" duplicate mortgage entry now off....
... and my scores went down!"

Whether a duplicate account helps or hurts your scores depends on the age, balance, the rest of your report, etc.

"i've tried twice to post this thread to the "credit scoring causes defaults" section, and it doesn't show up."

It's probably moderator only posting, strange that you would even see a "post" button. Sorry!

dougpratt
the error on my credit reports was a first mortgage on my house being reported twice-- the $447,500 note with its $3418 monthly payment, and the new $444,000 note with a $2812 payment. my middle score dropped three points when the duplicate entry was removed, even though my reported net monthly obligation went down by the larger $3418 figure as cendant mortgage corrected their mistake. am i riskier with a $2812 monthly obligation to pay on my primary residence, or $6,230? {UN}fair isaac has already expressed their opinion, and nothing else in my credit profile has changed-- still no lates or derogatory entries of any kind, ever.

when a lending officer reviews a potential borrower's application, past performance on outstanding obligations is an important, but not the only, factor to consider. FICO scoring claims to accurately evaluate "risk of default," but it ignores merit altogether. what is merit? from a strictly business perspective, i would define merit as things such as LTV, equity, income, rent roles vs. market vacancy rates, dollar value of loan requested vs. liability, purpose of loan, stability of collatoral value, stability of borrower employment, and reasonably foreseeable trends of all of these elements into the future. if i could make one unbiased suggestion to {UN}fair isaac to make their system more accurate and effective, i would advise them to score the borrower's proposition, not just the borrower's past or present credit picture. making a $52 credit card payment five days late, or having sprint report a $17 phone bill delinquent from 1997 doesn't justify jacking anybody's mortgage payment by $700 a month, this with letters in hand from creditors who admit to their mistakes and put it in writing to boot. this is not any form of reputible business; IT IS A SCAM! it is legalized theft, and most of the victims don't even know how it affects them. neither would i, had i not begun researching it when it started interefering with what was not long ago a fine living and one rewarding, lucrative, and very successful career in real estate. FICO is a mosquito that sucks blood from everybody, and i'm just one in a million who was in the wrong place at the wrong time and came down with credit-scored malaria. i could digress into phenotypical constructs of the hemoglobin molecule, and atypical synthesis of this protein as it is relevant in heterozygously dominant genetic profiles to sickle-cell anemia, and mechanics of how this aberrant protein confers immunity to malaria, but it wouldn't help us understand, revise, or elimate the great blight of FICO upon consumer rights and as i've said many times before, the american dream. there's no doubt in my mind that {UN}fair isaac is homozygously recessive in the real world for just about every disease out there, and apart from blue eyes, you need no background in genetics to figure out what this means. along with sickle cell anemia, let's add haemophilia, cystic fibrosis, tay-sachs, albinism, and hapsford's. is FICO good enough to avoid sex-chromosome and nondysjunctional disease? i would vote NO for them like they're voting NO for me. down's syndrome, hemaphroditism, kleinfelter's, XYY nondysjunction, 8/23, 8/41, or 23/41 polymorphous anomalyzations, asexuality [human "mule", with 46th chromosome missing,] dwarfism, endo/exodermic cystic neurofibromatosis.

i have baby blue eyes. FICO is a disease-- not like the flu or bad cold you catch and get rid of; this one runs deep, like the genetic diseases i've mentioned in this posting, or a lunatic like hitler who brought his country and 67,000,000 human lives to ruin on a pack of lies he sold off to a people in despair, not in their interest, but in his alone. {UN}fair isaac could prosper by applying their skills where they might serve the greater good-- constructive uses of computer modeling are immeasurable; let them start by giving us reliable weather forecasts 30 hours in advance, not by predicting borrower performance on home loans 30 years in advance. when i was at harvard, a group of students used computer modeling to predict squid migrations, and the fishermen who used it saw their yields almost triple. how 'bout models for stock market investing? i haven't been successful there at all, but at least the rules and risks are made clear before you go in, and unless somebody has been truly deceitful [eg, IVEH], i wouldn't think of complaining or taking legal action-- the single instance where i was deliberately misled turned into an $1800 loss, and the parties responsible are under indictment by the SEC and will probably go to jail. imagine what any company able to accurately predict human behaviors by computer could do if their programs actually worked!?! if {UN}fair isaac is the forerunner in this field, and if such technology is even foreseeable in the distant future, why are they wasting their time and resources trying to figure out who might or might not default on their mortgage?? one reason is, computer technology cannot, does not, and will not at any time in the foreseeable future, have a clue at predicting human behavior. along with interstellar space travel and rewiring the nervous system, i would guesstimate this technology to be more than a century away, at best. christopher reeves will run 3 minute miles and mars will have a full manmade biosphere long before computer technology reaches this point, a 1000-fold increase in capacity each decade notwithstanding. all a machine can do is emulate human intelligence-- it cannot attain it.

another main reason for this is greed. lenders are getting richer by the hour, and {UN}fair isaac, driving the whole monopolistic scam, sits back and gorges on the blood of america. one of these days, somebody with the power to act will squeeze where the parasite is feeding, then watch it fill up and bust! i may not be able to do it myself, but here i sit, shining a bright light on the mosquito that's sucked the life out of my chosen career and financial future. fraud and lies can prevail only for a time, not forever as does truth. i sit back and await the day when this mosquito will POP! and splatter on its own gluttony. sing we all good riddance to bad rubbish.

so much for now--- i've had enough. good night.