sharpenu
This could be long, bear with me. I will make every attempt to keep it short.
After several months of going back and forth, I filed a suit against XYZ Finance. XYZ Finance then settled for:
1. Deletion
2. Releasing me from claim on debt.
In exchange, I had to dismiss my suit with prejudice and agree to hold harmless XYZ from any further claim. There was also a non-disclosure clause.
The agreement was reached Dec 3, 2002. I filed a dispute on Dec 5 and the account was deleted from my EQ file on Dec 31, 2002.
On Jan 13, the tradeline reappeared. I called EQ and asked them to send me the FCRA required documents for relisting an account that has been deleted as a result of investigation. EQ told me that the account has never been deleted, it has always been there, so they dont have to provide the documents. I have CR's pulled 8 different times between 12/31 and 1/13 that prove otherwise.
Now, my questions:
1. Should I go after EQ for FCRA violations, as I think I can prove that they are in violation of §611?
2. Is the fact that I agreed to the hold harmless clause still valid, now that they have broken the settlement by relisting the account? Or can I have that vacated?
3. Is the Dismissal with prejudice still valid, since they violated the settlement terms?
4. Any other thoughts? Where can I go with this?
After several months of going back and forth, I filed a suit against XYZ Finance. XYZ Finance then settled for:
1. Deletion
2. Releasing me from claim on debt.
In exchange, I had to dismiss my suit with prejudice and agree to hold harmless XYZ from any further claim. There was also a non-disclosure clause.
The agreement was reached Dec 3, 2002. I filed a dispute on Dec 5 and the account was deleted from my EQ file on Dec 31, 2002.
On Jan 13, the tradeline reappeared. I called EQ and asked them to send me the FCRA required documents for relisting an account that has been deleted as a result of investigation. EQ told me that the account has never been deleted, it has always been there, so they dont have to provide the documents. I have CR's pulled 8 different times between 12/31 and 1/13 that prove otherwise.
Now, my questions:
1. Should I go after EQ for FCRA violations, as I think I can prove that they are in violation of §611?
2. Is the fact that I agreed to the hold harmless clause still valid, now that they have broken the settlement by relisting the account? Or can I have that vacated?
3. Is the Dismissal with prejudice still valid, since they violated the settlement terms?
4. Any other thoughts? Where can I go with this?